• About Jeff Richards

    - Venture Capitalist @ GGV Capital
    - Dad
    - Entrepreneur

  • Subscribe with Feedburner

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 60 other followers

  • Top Posts & Pages

  • Recently on 13 hrs to think

  • Join 60 other followers

  • Admin

Really Proud

App class grads April 2013

This past weekend, 10 kids gave up their Saturday and Sunday mornings (8:00 – 1:00 each day) to learn the basics of building apps(“coding”) for mobile devices. I am so proud of these kids – as well as our instructor, Jateen Bhakta.  More information and thoughts below, but this is just the beginning for our new organization, Tri Valley YEAH! and our partnership with the Menlo App Academy.  Click here for more photos from this past weekend’s class.


The broader story:

In early 2011, my friend Jason LaBarbera and I started discussing the topic of kids, education, and technology. We both a) have kids and b) are in careers focused on Silicon Valley and the technology industry (myself as an entrepreneur and venture capitalist and Jason as owner and CEO of a successful recruiting firm focused on the tech industry).

Over the past 24 months, we met many times for breakfast, coffee, etc. and kept focusing on a basic question: Why aren’t our schools teaching kids the basics of computer science (CS) at an early age?

The background for our conversation is simple. Many of the best-paying jobs in America are in Engineering in Silicon Valley. Companies have hundreds of thousands of open positions for Engineers (not just in SV). Many kids graduating from college today do not have the CS skills to apply for these jobs. Many of the wealthiest entrepreneurs in the world started as Engineers (see: Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates and many more).

So why aren’t our schools starting to teach CS at an early age – just like they teach English, Math, History, Science and other subjects?

We did some research on the subject and found a host of reasons, but the primary ones center around a) state requirements & testing on existing curriculum, b) lack of teachers to teach the courses and c) inertia. Our sincere hope is that the rising press coverage on this subject, support from leaders like Michael Bloomberg and President Obama, new platforms like CodeAcademy and Code.org, and growing awareness among parents of the value of Computer Science will move the ball forward.

Until that time comes…

We’re moving forward with a grass-roots solution.

Jason, his colleague Mitch Eason and I were fortunate to connect last year with the founders of the Menlo App Academy (an amazing group of parents and kids – read more about them in Forbes), who have developed an awesome, basic curriculum to teach kids to build mobile apps using the Corona SDK. Via the MAA team, we met up with  Jateen Bhakta, a passionate part-time teacher and game developer. After a few months of work and collaboration with the Menlo App Academy team, this past weekend we officially launched the local program for kids in the Tri Valley (East Bay, CA) area – Tri Valley YEAH! (Youth Empowered Apps Happening!).three girls at TVY April 7

Our goal is not to turn 10 year-olds into Ruby engineers. Rather, it is to introduce kids to the concepts of coding, quickly get them to a point of “instant gratification” (building an app), and provide ongoing resources and encouragement to learn more. Ideally over time we’ll partner with educational institutions to try to scale this throughout the Tri Valley area (300,000 residents). If some percentage of the kids in our programs go on to learn more about CS and eventually become Engineers, we’ve succeeded.

For now, as I said above, I’m just really proud of our team and the kids. We had a ton of fun this weekend, and it was awesome to see the kids faces light up as they made modifications to their apps. And thankful to Max Colbert, Matt Dillabough and their parents who pioneered this model and came up with the core curriculum.


Content, Community and Commerce: Why Verticals Win

Houzz1When it comes to the three C’s – Content, Community and Commerce – we have a very basic thesis we have been investing around for several years now: vertical platforms win.

What do I mean by “win?” Deliver a (much) better experience for users. Create value for brands and advertisers. Deliver higher monetization rates (and thus value) for management and investors. Win for consumers, win for brands, win for management. And they can do it at scale, which is where we believe many of the horizontal platforms start to degrade.

How do they do it?

Content. By focusing their efforts on a specific interest area, vertical sites can deliver the best user experience around content. Images, text, search and sharing are all tailored to the area of interest. Don’t believe me? Look up “kitchen” or “kitchen remodel” on Pinterest, then go to the “Kitchens” section on Houzz. For someone who is interested in architecture, design or remodeling kitchens, the experience on Houzz is dramatically better (unless you want a random picture of a naked woman in a kitchen, which did pop up in my search on Pinterest).

Community. If in a large enough category (think: home improvement, music, fashion, travel), a vertical platform can amass a big enough audience to truly create a thriving community. Yelp has done this exceptionally well in a giant vertical, and now has more than 100 million unique monthly users. Google, Foursquare and startups like Ness are challenging (especially using mobile as a trojan horse), but Yelp has the largest and most focused community, and it’ll be tough to beat Yelp if it continues to innovate. Another great example is Zillow, where users are encouraged to “claim” their home and input their own data and photos. It’s working – Zillow has more than 45 million unique visitors every month, and more than half are on a mobile device. Last year we invested in an e-commerce business called Citrus Lane which is focused on building a large community of moms around its brand; a community opportunity we don’t see with many other e-commerce businesses. Given that moms spend more than $45 billion each year on their babies (first time moms spend $16 billion alone), and more than 100,000 babies are born every day in the U.S. alone, we think this category is not only large enough to support a vertical winner but also emblematic of a “mobile first” opportunity. More and more moms spend the majority of their time on their iPhone or Android device and very little in front of a PC.

Commerce. The beauty of nailing content and community in a vertical platform is your users actually want a commercial experience. And when I say “commercial experience,” I don’t just mean “ads” (which tends to be the de facto model for horizontal platforms). Meilishuo, the top vertical platform in China for women’s fashion has more than 4 million daily active users, almost all of whom are females between the ages of 20 and 35. It’s a highly focused, engaged and active community. When you utilize Meilishuo (best on iPad), one of the first things you’ll notice is it’s intentionally commercial – you can click to purchase more than 95% of the content on the site. You don’t see that on horizontal platforms like Instagram or Pinterest. As a result, Meilishuo is driving hundreds of millions of dollars of GMV (gross merchandise volume) in the fashion category. (Funny anecdote – when I was in NY with Meilishuo CEO Xirong Yu, I showed him Instagram. He kept clicking on images and saying “Why can’t I buy it?”)

Perhaps the most important point is this last one: these vertical sites are intentionally set up to drive commerce. It’s part of the core user experience. Upon introducing several friends to Houzz last year, more than one came back to me and said “I’d like to see more tags!” The products are part of the user experience and – done in a tasteful manner – play an integral role in the consumer’s engagement on the site.

The biggest challenge with vertical platforms – historically – has been getting enough critical mass to matter.  There are vertical sites all over the web for almost every niche interest you can think of. Many of these are in fact small, thriving communities with no venture capital backing and a highly profitable business model. Others – like those mentioned above – are already big and getting bigger (think Spotify, in music). Given the commercial aspect of these vertical platforms, they tend to monetize at a much higher rate per user than their horizontal peers. As Xirong from Meilishuo put it to me: “I don’t want a billion users. I want the most valuable 200 million users.”

Horizontal platforms play an important role in the Internet ecosystem, and my bet is Facebook and its social graph will play a really important role for a very long time. But – it will be very hard for other vertical platforms to gain prominence, and few (if any) will monetize as well as the rising vertical platforms. These new vertical platforms are also the most likely to develop innovative forms of monetization as we move to a “mobile-first” environment (phone & tablet).

A few questions we’ll be watching closely over the next year or so (that this post doesn’t attempt to answer):

– Will the horizontal platforms (Facebook, Google, Tencent, Baidu, etc.) eventually “win” in these large categories, despite early leads from the upstart innovators?  Seems unlikely, unless… (see next point)

– Will the big horizontal platforms acquire the new vertical leaders in the interest of garnering eyeballs and also alternate / non advertising-based models of monetization?

– Will the emerging vertical platform leaders be able to go global – as the horizontals have (more than 75% of Facebook users are from outside the U.S.)? As they do, will they be beaten to the punch by local vertical leaders?

– Will we see many, valuable vertical players (sort of like the SaaS space in enterprise), or consolidation and just a few winners?

Many unanswered questions, but a battle that will be fun to watch with billions of dollars at stake.

Disclosure: my firm, GGV Capital, invests across the US and China, and is an investor in Houzz, Citrus Lane and Meilishuo.

%d bloggers like this: